Revenue leakage review

Claims Are Going Out. Is Revenue Coming Back?

Common billing and follow-up gaps can leave money on the table. A Complimentary RCM Review helps identify where further investigation may be needed—without assuming what is happening in your practice.

  • Claims submitted
  • Denials & edits
  • Aging balances
A revenue-cycle professional reviews billing reports on a computer while focused on claims and payments.

Potential causes to investigate

Where revenue can leak

These are common places practices ask MRX to examine. They are possibilities to investigate—not a diagnosis of your current operations.

  • 01

    Claims and rejections

    Claims that fail front-end edits and never reach adjudication.

  • 02

    Denials

    Payer denials that need correction, appeal, or clearer root-cause review.

  • 03

    Aging AR

    Open balances that remain without a clear next action or owner.

  • 04

    Underpayments

    Payments that look closed but may not match expected reimbursement.

  • 05

    Eligibility and authorization gaps

    Coverage checks skipped, outdated, or missing when a plan requires prior auth.

  • 06

    Coding and charge-entry issues

    Mismatched codes, missing charges, or incomplete documentation for billing.

  • 07

    Delayed follow-up

    Open claims that age without timely work queues or consistent ownership.

What MRX can review

Connect the issue to the revenue-cycle process

A Complimentary RCM Review looks across the billing path—from front-end checks through follow-up—so you can see which steps deserve a closer look.

Issue area

Eligibility & authorization

Process to examine

Front-end verification and auth workflows

How a review helps

See how checks fit before the claim is built

Issue area

Coding & charge entry

Process to examine

Charge capture into clean claim prep

How a review helps

Connect documentation gaps to claim quality

Issue area

Rejections & denials

Process to examine

Submission edits, denial work, and appeals

How a review helps

Trace why claims stall after send

Issue area

AR & underpayments

Process to examine

Posting, reconciliation, and follow-up queues

How a review helps

Review open balances and payment patterns

How the review works

A clear, honest sequence

  1. 01

    Share practice context

    Tell us about the practice, the systems in use, and the pressure points you want discussed. Do not send patient-identifying information.

  2. 02

    Align on scope

    MRX confirms which workflows or reports are useful to review together before any deeper work begins.

  3. 03

    Identify next investigation areas

    The conversation surfaces where further review may be needed—not a guaranteed recovery amount or fixed deliverable set.

Do not include patient names, dates of birth, member IDs, or clinical details. This inquiry does not schedule a meeting.

Next step

Request a Complimentary RCM Review

Share the areas you want to discuss. Helpful context can include specialty, EHR, and approximate claim volume—never patient identifiers.

See common warning signs

  • Same Complimentary RCM Review inquiry used across the site
  • Delivered by email when server mail is configured
  • Submitting does not schedule a call

RCM Review request

Do not include patient names, dates of birth, member IDs, or clinical details. Submissions are emailed when delivery is configured on the server. Nothing is stored on this website. Appointment booking is not connected; submitting this form does not schedule a call.

Revenue areas to discuss

Do not include patient names, dates of birth, member IDs, or clinical details.